Low-A West: Pitching Leaders: GS

Triple-A	Triple-A West	Triple-A East
Double-A	Double-A Central	Double-A Northeast	Double-A South
High-A	High-A West	High-A Central	High-A East
Low-A	Low-A West	Low-A Southeast	Low-A East

Batting	Pitching

Rank	Pitcher	Age	Team	Org	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	BABIP	HR/FB	GB%	Swing%	Contact%	F-Strike%	SwStr%	CStr%	CSW%
1	Carson Ragsdale	26.4	San Jose	SF	25	25	120.0	4.80	3.53	3.01	12.9	3.6	1.0	.361	14.3%	38%	46.6%	67.9%	58.9%	15.0%	19.4%	34.4%
2	Kyle Harrison	23.2	San Jose	SF	24	24	105.0	3.77	2.82	3.12	14.0	4.5	0.3	.383	4.9%	50%	45.2%	61.4%	57.5%	17.5%	16.5%	34.0%
2	Prelander Berroa	24.5	San Jose	SF	24	24	99.3	4.62	4.31	3.39	12.2	4.8	1.2	.313	18.3%	39%	43.6%	67.2%	52.7%	14.3%	17.2%	31.5%
4	Josias De Los Santos	25.3	Modesto	SEA	20	20	95.7	6.49	4.97	5.05	8.5	6.6	0.7	.342	9.7%	40%	43.4%	73.9%	47.1%	11.3%	13.2%	24.5%
5	Samuel Carlson	25.9	Modesto	SEA	19	19	100.0	6.12	3.99	4.01	10.1	4.0	0.6	.357	10.1%	47%	45.2%	71.6%	52.8%	12.9%	16.4%	29.3%
5	Kendall Williams	24.2	Rancho Cucamonga	LAD	23	19	93.0	6.19	4.53	3.54	8.4	2.1	1.4	.327	21.5%	53%	54.6%	68.1%	60.6%	17.4%	12.6%	30.1%
5	William Jensen	27.2	San Jose	SF	23	19	102.7	3.94	3.79	3.32	9.6	2.2	1.1	.305	14.0%	38%	52.2%	67.4%	58.1%	17.0%	13.5%	30.5%
8	Jack Kochanowicz	23.9	Inland Empire	LAA	20	18	83.7	7.75	5.09	4.28	7.9	3.8	1.3	.347	16.4%	48%	45.9%	78.6%	55.0%	9.8%	17.8%	27.6%
8	Nicholas Thwaits	25.4	Lake Elsinore	SD	22	18	87.0	7.14	4.40	4.23	9.0	3.6	0.9	.365	10.5%	40%	47.2%	75.0%	52.6%	11.8%	15.6%	27.4%
8	James Lewis	24.0	Rancho Cucamonga	LAD	23	18	50.3	9.30	6.81	5.48	6.6	5.2	1.8	.331	20.8%	39%	41.0%	76.8%	49.1%	9.5%	16.7%	26.2%
8	Carlos Duran	23.3	Rancho Cucamonga	LAD	20	18	74.0	6.08	3.58	2.93	13.3	2.9	1.1	.383	19.1%	47%	45.4%	67.4%	52.8%	14.8%	17.6%	32.4%
8	Robert Peto	26.3	Rancho Cucamonga	LAD	20	18	70.3	5.76	5.19	4.15	9.2	3.7	1.5	.313	16.2%	33%	49.4%	70.6%	52.3%	14.5%	12.9%	27.4%
13	Jose Salvador	25.1	Inland Empire	LAA	20	17	96.0	6.09	4.22	3.85	10.8	4.4	0.9	.370	13.9%	38%	43.6%	66.6%	51.9%	14.5%	16.1%	30.7%
13	Michael Ruff	26.6	Fresno	COL	17	17	74.7	4.82	4.02	4.07	10.0	4.2	0.6	.320	8.2%	40%	49.5%	72.4%	58.5%	13.6%	14.5%	28.1%
13	David Thomas	26.3	Lake Elsinore	SD	22	17	84.3	5.87	4.46	4.05	9.6	3.9	1.0	.342	12.9%	40%	45.8%	72.0%	56.4%	12.8%	16.6%	29.5%
13	Gavin Stone	26.1	Rancho Cucamonga	LAD	18	17	70.3	4.35	2.56	2.41	12.9	2.6	0.6	.383	13.5%	45%	48.4%	62.0%	56.8%	18.4%	16.9%	35.3%
17	Connor Phillips	23.5	Modesto	SEA	16	16	72.0	5.13	2.90	3.47	13.0	5.5	0.1	.367	2.4%	41%	41.4%	62.2%	48.2%	15.7%	17.8%	33.5%
18	John Swanda	25.6	Inland Empire	LAA	20	15	104.3	5.43	4.50	3.69	7.9	2.8	1.1	.293	21.7%	57%	47.9%	74.3%	57.1%	12.3%	17.0%	29.4%
18	Austin Pope	26.0	Visalia	ARI	18	15	72.3	9.33	4.47	4.12	10.5	4.5	1.0	.423	15.4%	47%	44.7%	70.2%	53.9%	13.3%	17.0%	30.3%
18	Junior Mieses	25.1	Visalia	ARI	22	15	81.0	8.56	6.17	5.51	9.9	8.0	1.1	.364	21.3%	42%	45.3%	67.2%	43.7%	14.9%	11.3%	26.1%
18	Samuel Weatherly	25.4	Fresno	COL	15	15	69.0	4.96	3.97	3.56	12.5	4.2	0.9	.347	12.7%	33%	44.0%	67.3%	53.6%	14.4%	17.2%	31.6%
18	Anderson Amarista	26.1	Fresno	COL	16	15	73.7	6.84	4.89	4.10	9.2	4.0	1.2	.345	18.2%	45%	48.9%	73.8%	57.1%	12.8%	13.8%	26.7%
18	Dwayne Matos	24.0	Lake Elsinore	SD	20	15	77.3	6.40	4.59	4.22	6.4	2.3	1.0	.347	12.5%	45%	53.3%	75.8%	60.4%	12.9%	13.8%	26.7%
24	Adam Seminaris	26.0	Inland Empire	LAA	16	14	64.3	6.16	3.63	2.64	13.2	2.7	1.3	.395	29.0%	49%	49.3%	63.2%	58.8%	18.1%	16.5%	34.6%
24	Avery Short	23.6	Visalia	ARI	15	14	57.7	8.27	4.44	4.17	9.4	3.6	0.9	.387	12.8%	42%	49.0%	70.2%	56.9%	14.6%	13.9%	28.6%
24	Jesus Lugo	26.8	Lake Elsinore	SD	15	14	45.0	4.80	5.12	3.92	10.8	3.4	1.6	.319	16.7%	35%	46.2%	69.8%	52.5%	13.9%	14.9%	28.8%
24	Jake Walkinshaw	28.3	Stockton	OAK	16	14	72.3	5.35	4.11	3.96	7.8	3.1	0.7	.357	11.3%	51%	50.6%	74.0%	61.5%	13.2%	13.6%	26.8%
24	Ryan Murphy	25.1	San Jose	SF	14	14	71.3	4.16	3.43	2.21	13.2	2.0	1.4	.324	20.4%	42%	47.5%	64.5%	61.7%	16.9%	17.8%	34.7%
29	Adrian Del Moral	25.7	Visalia	ARI	16	13	58.7	10.43	6.23	4.65	7.1	3.5	1.8	.380	29.3%	49%	47.6%	78.9%	56.0%	10.0%	15.1%	25.1%
29	Noel Vela	25.9	Lake Elsinore	SD	13	13	54.3	5.96	4.20	3.86	10.4	5.0	0.8	.264	10.6%	41%	46.5%	67.0%	52.2%	15.4%	13.6%	28.9%