Low-A: Pitching Leaders: BB/9

Triple-A	Triple-A West	Triple-A East
Double-A	Double-A Central	Double-A Northeast	Double-A South
High-A	High-A West	High-A Central	High-A East
Low-A	Low-A West	Low-A Southeast	Low-A East

Batting	Pitching

Rank	Pitcher	Age	Team	Org	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	BABIP	HR/FB	GB%	Swing%	Contact%	F-Strike%	SwStr%	CStr%	CSW%
1	Jaime Arias-Bautista	25.8	Lynchburg	CLE	23	9	88.3	4.08	3.41	2.54	11.3	1.5	1.2	.266	21.1%	37%	53.4%	69.5%	59.8%	16.3%	15.9%	32.2%
2	Benjamin Brecht	26.8	Charleston	TB	20	17	81.7	3.75	4.15	3.27	8.3	1.8	1.2	.235	17.5%	39%	55.2%	73.1%	63.9%	14.8%	13.7%	28.5%
3	Kendall Williams	24.2	Rancho Cucamonga	LAD	23	19	93.0	6.19	4.53	3.54	8.4	2.1	1.4	.327	21.5%	53%	54.6%	68.1%	60.6%	17.4%	12.6%	30.1%
4	William Jensen	27.2	San Jose	SF	23	19	102.7	3.94	3.79	3.32	9.6	2.2	1.1	.305	14.0%	38%	52.2%	67.4%	58.1%	17.0%	13.5%	30.5%
5	Manuel Espinoza	24.0	Myrtle Beach	CHC	22	22	98.7	6.02	5.03	3.90	8.4	2.4	1.6	.326	18.8%	35%	51.0%	77.5%	61.1%	11.5%	14.5%	26.0%
6	Nicholas Krauth	25.2	Down East	TEX	20	20	102.7	4.65	4.54	4.10	6.9	2.5	1.0	.298	16.7%	52%	52.1%	77.4%	57.5%	11.8%	12.6%	24.3%
6	Jhoan Cruz	24.4	Carolina	MIL	20	15	81.7	6.61	5.25	4.04	8.7	2.5	1.8	.394	17.8%	36%	50.2%	72.3%	54.7%	13.9%	13.1%	27.0%
8	Oscar Rojas	25.5	St. Lucie	NYM	14	13	79.0	3.76	3.91	3.63	8.8	2.6	0.8	.291	12.5%	46%	46.1%	73.0%	56.1%	12.4%	16.3%	28.7%
8	Joseph Estes	23.1	Augusta	ATL	20	20	99.0	3.55	2.93	2.88	11.5	2.6	0.6	.261	10.1%	33%	50.8%	68.4%	64.2%	16.1%	16.8%	32.9%
10	Karlo Seijas	24.2	Fredericksburg	WSH	22	22	97.0	7.89	5.08	4.39	7.6	2.7	1.5	.342	15.2%	28%	49.9%	75.7%	57.8%	12.1%	12.8%	24.9%
10	Christopher Mokma	23.7	Jupiter	MIA	21	21	92.7	7.19	5.51	4.35	7.6	2.7	1.7	.358	20.2%	39%	51.3%	77.0%	56.3%	11.8%	12.8%	24.6%
12	John Swanda	25.6	Inland Empire	LAA	20	15	104.3	5.43	4.50	3.69	7.9	2.8	1.1	.293	21.7%	57%	47.9%	74.3%	57.1%	12.3%	17.0%	29.4%
12	Adrian Florencio	26.1	Bradenton	PIT	20	19	96.0	3.38	3.13	3.18	11.2	2.8	0.6	.283	10.9%	39%	49.1%	68.5%	52.4%	15.5%	15.4%	30.8%
12	Adrian Alcantara	25.2	Columbia	KC	24	20	96.3	6.26	5.34	3.95	9.2	2.8	1.7	.315	20.9%	41%	47.7%	72.5%	52.8%	13.1%	14.9%	28.0%
15	Luis Ortiz	25.8	Bradenton	PIT	23	20	93.7	4.42	2.96	2.91	11.7	2.9	0.6	.346	13.3%	48%	47.7%	65.0%	52.6%	16.7%	16.4%	33.1%
15	Michael Cuevas	23.3	Fredericksburg	WSH	20	17	88.3	5.60	4.16	3.86	8.2	2.9	0.8	.295	15.4%	53%	47.5%	72.0%	55.0%	13.3%	15.8%	29.1%
17	Seth Johnson	26.1	Charleston	TB	24	17	100.3	3.95	3.35	3.15	10.9	3.0	0.7	.339	13.1%	48%	50.0%	70.9%	56.2%	14.5%	14.8%	29.4%
18	Richard Gallardo	23.2	Myrtle Beach	CHC	21	21	91.3	5.22	4.29	4.08	7.4	3.2	0.8	.302	17.4%	52%	48.6%	81.5%	55.2%	9.0%	15.0%	23.9%
19	Houston Roth	26.7	Delmarva	BAL	23	10	81.3	5.31	4.29	4.10	8.5	3.4	0.9	.271	10.4%	34%	45.1%	74.5%	54.9%	11.5%	16.9%	28.4%
19	Nicholas Davila	26.0	Lakeland	DET	27	13	94.0	4.31	3.77	3.85	9.5	3.4	0.6	.317	9.2%	41%	49.2%	74.1%	57.1%	12.7%	16.3%	29.0%
21	Junior Santos	23.2	St. Lucie	NYM	21	16	96.3	5.61	4.48	4.37	7.4	3.6	0.7	.345	11.8%	49%	48.0%	80.1%	58.3%	9.6%	13.4%	23.0%
21	Nicholas Thwaits	25.4	Lake Elsinore	SD	22	18	87.0	7.14	4.40	4.23	9.0	3.6	0.9	.365	10.5%	40%	47.2%	75.0%	52.6%	11.8%	15.6%	27.4%
21	Carson Ragsdale	26.4	San Jose	SF	25	25	120.0	4.80	3.53	3.01	12.9	3.6	1.0	.361	14.3%	38%	46.6%	67.9%	58.9%	15.0%	19.4%	34.4%
24	Julio Goff	24.8	Inland Empire	LAA	22	9	90.7	5.26	4.12	4.27	7.8	3.7	0.6	.284	7.8%	35%	46.0%	72.3%	52.9%	12.8%	15.7%	28.5%
24	Jason Parker	27.0	Daytona	CIN	19	18	80.0	4.50	4.08	3.86	10.2	3.7	0.8	.287	11.9%	39%	44.5%	70.2%	51.4%	13.3%	16.9%	30.2%
24	Matthew Givin	25.4	Jupiter	MIA	19	14	90.0	4.70	4.55	4.42	7.4	3.7	0.8	.306	12.9%	43%	48.2%	74.5%	54.8%	12.3%	12.9%	25.2%
27	Jack Kochanowicz	23.9	Inland Empire	LAA	20	18	83.7	7.75	5.09	4.28	7.9	3.8	1.3	.347	16.4%	48%	45.9%	78.6%	55.0%	9.8%	17.8%	27.6%
27	Bradley Blalock	23.9	Salem	BOS	23	23	86.0	5.13	3.82	4.05	8.9	3.8	0.5	.354	11.1%	47%	49.5%	72.2%	56.2%	13.8%	13.4%	27.1%
29	David Thomas	26.3	Lake Elsinore	SD	22	17	84.3	5.87	4.46	4.05	9.6	3.9	1.0	.342	12.9%	40%	45.8%	72.0%	56.4%	12.8%	16.6%	29.5%
30	Samuel Carlson	25.9	Modesto	SEA	19	19	100.0	6.12	3.99	4.01	10.1	4.0	0.6	.357	10.1%	47%	45.2%	71.6%	52.8%	12.9%	16.4%	29.3%