High-A: Pitching Leaders: IP

Triple-A	Triple-A West	Triple-A East
Double-A	Double-A Central	Double-A Northeast	Double-A South
High-A	High-A West	High-A Central	High-A East
Low-A	Low-A West	Low-A Southeast	Low-A East

Batting	Pitching

Rank	Pitcher	Age	Team	Org	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	xFIP	K/9	BB/9	HR/9	BABIP	HR/FB	GB%	Swing%	Contact%	F-Strike%	SwStr%	CStr%	CSW%
1	Bryan Hoeing	28.0	Beloit	MIA	22	22	121.0	5.28	4.14	3.71	7.1	1.8	1.0	.310	16.5%	55%	48.7%	76.9%	64.4%	11.3%	16.7%	28.0%
2	Christopher McMahon	25.7	Spokane	COL	23	21	120.7	4.25	3.84	3.60	9.4	2.5	1.0	.336	12.0%	38%	51.8%	74.0%	64.5%	13.5%	15.7%	29.1%
2	Connor Lunn	26.3	Peoria	STL	24	23	120.7	4.48	3.52	3.14	9.0	1.5	0.9	.315	13.3%	45%	52.5%	73.7%	61.9%	13.8%	16.9%	30.7%
4	Conner Nurse	25.3	Eugene	SF	24	21	119.7	4.96	5.23	4.02	9.2	3.9	1.6	.301	18.9%	40%	48.5%	73.4%	58.2%	12.9%	15.7%	28.6%
5	Chase Shugart	28.0	Greenville	BOS	22	22	105.3	4.96	4.16	3.66	7.9	2.1	1.0	.351	16.7%	50%	50.0%	78.0%	60.3%	11.0%	17.1%	28.0%
6	Mitch Spence	26.5	Hudson Valley	NYY	23	20	105.0	4.37	3.81	3.37	10.1	3.2	0.9	.330	19.2%	54%	47.6%	67.9%	61.0%	15.3%	18.3%	33.6%
7	Reid Birlingmair	28.0	Lansing	OAK	21	21	103.0	4.89	5.40	4.68	7.3	4.5	1.1	.266	19.1%	47%	46.8%	75.0%	55.2%	11.7%	14.0%	25.7%
7	Jesus Vargas	26.2	Great Lakes	LAD	24	14	103.0	5.07	4.76	3.67	7.7	1.2	1.6	.287	17.5%	40%	51.2%	76.9%	61.4%	11.8%	16.9%	28.7%
9	Paxton Schultz	26.8	Vancouver	TOR	22	21	102.7	5.96	4.19	3.73	10.0	3.9	1.0	.363	17.5%	47%	47.0%	69.0%	56.1%	14.6%	14.1%	28.7%
10	Adam Kloffenstein	24.2	Vancouver	TOR	23	23	102.0	6.71	4.76	4.37	9.4	5.4	0.9	.313	15.6%	53%	46.0%	69.1%	51.5%	14.2%	13.8%	28.0%
11	Brendan White	26.0	West Michigan	DET	26	18	101.7	4.78	3.84	3.54	9.5	2.4	0.8	.328	17.3%	53%	49.3%	75.6%	60.0%	12.0%	16.7%	28.7%
12	Helcris Olivarez	24.2	Spokane	COL	23	22	100.7	7.33	5.75	4.93	10.0	6.3	1.2	.340	21.7%	50%	44.5%	68.6%	47.4%	14.0%	14.8%	28.7%
13	Logan Gragg	26.2	Peoria	STL	25	20	99.0	5.09	4.88	4.19	7.3	2.5	1.4	.309	14.9%	33%	53.4%	77.7%	65.1%	11.9%	14.5%	26.4%
14	Eduardo Salazar	26.5	Dayton	CIN	19	19	98.3	3.84	3.27	3.36	9.8	2.9	0.5	.298	8.3%	47%	45.3%	73.6%	56.7%	11.9%	19.1%	31.1%
14	Wilfredo Pereira	25.5	Peoria	STL	29	13	98.3	4.12	3.87	3.67	10.7	3.8	0.9	.285	11.1%	29%	47.8%	66.7%	52.7%	15.9%	14.3%	30.2%
16	Mason Hickman	25.9	Lake County	CLE	20	20	97.7	5.44	4.59	3.75	10.1	3.4	1.4	.296	13.9%	36%	41.9%	76.2%	52.2%	10.0%	19.6%	29.5%
16	Anthony Veneziano	27.2	Quad Cities	KC	23	23	97.7	4.24	3.84	3.20	12.1	3.5	1.0	.316	16.7%	42%	51.2%	63.7%	57.4%	18.6%	13.5%	32.1%
18	Victor Castaneda	26.2	Wisconsin	MIL	20	20	97.0	5.20	4.89	3.46	10.6	3.4	1.7	.298	20.7%	35%	46.1%	66.8%	57.9%	15.3%	16.6%	32.0%
19	Kai-Wei Teng	25.9	Eugene	SF	21	21	95.7	4.70	4.18	3.42	13.4	5.1	1.0	.330	20.0%	48%	40.3%	60.8%	56.0%	15.8%	19.1%	34.9%
19	Michael YaSenka	26.4	Peoria	STL	24	21	95.7	6.96	5.66	4.48	9.7	5.4	1.6	.294	17.3%	31%	48.8%	71.1%	51.2%	14.1%	12.1%	26.2%
21	Maxwell Bain	27.1	South Bend	CHC	22	21	93.0	6.19	4.95	4.49	10.9	5.4	1.1	.313	12.6%	32%	44.1%	68.2%	50.8%	14.0%	14.7%	28.7%
22	Charles Priester	24.1	Greensboro	PIT	19	19	92.7	3.69	3.74	3.56	9.1	3.5	0.7	.286	14.6%	54%	45.4%	67.7%	54.7%	14.7%	15.2%	29.8%
23	Yusniel Padron-Artilles	27.0	Greenville	BOS	25	13	90.3	5.78	5.22	3.60	10.4	2.6	2.0	.332	21.5%	28%	50.9%	72.4%	63.7%	14.1%	16.1%	30.2%
24	Anthony Block	26.6	Quad Cities	KC	20	17	90.0	4.00	3.72	3.53	10.1	3.4	0.7	.293	11.5%	52%	45.7%	67.1%	56.7%	15.0%	17.4%	32.4%
25	Carson Spiers	27.0	Dayton	CIN	20	16	88.7	3.96	3.72	3.60	10.5	2.9	0.8	.293	10.7%	37%	47.9%	67.9%	61.9%	15.4%	17.0%	32.4%
26	Zack Trageton	26.2	Bowling Green	TB	28	12	88.3	4.89	4.15	3.53	8.6	2.2	1.1	.306	13.9%	45%	47.9%	77.8%	60.9%	10.7%	19.2%	29.8%
27	Joan Adon	26.2	Wilmington	WSH	17	17	87.3	5.26	3.88	3.80	9.4	3.3	0.7	.303	11.9%	46%	46.4%	72.0%	53.0%	13.0%	15.1%	28.1%
28	Jaison Vilera	27.4	Brooklyn	NYM	20	20	87.0	7.86	6.49	4.41	7.4	3.0	2.3	.315	28.6%	43%	48.4%	78.4%	52.8%	10.4%	13.3%	23.7%
29	Colin Peluse	26.4	Lansing	OAK	18	15	86.7	4.26	3.76	3.37	9.6	2.3	1.0	.319	12.3%	36%	50.5%	72.7%	66.3%	13.8%	17.5%	31.3%
30	Avery Weems	27.4	Hickory	TEX	20	19	85.3	5.70	4.28	2.69	13.1	2.8	1.7	.328	41.0%	48%	49.8%	65.1%	60.4%	17.4%	15.9%	33.3%
30	Hunter Gaddis	26.6	Lake County	CLE	18	17	85.3	6.33	4.82	3.06	12.3	2.5	1.9	.305	26.1%	33%	49.3%	65.5%	58.0%	17.0%	16.2%	33.2%